Signals / deepseek-harness profile
deepseek-harness
Sourced signals for deepseek-harness: release changes, governance moves, runtime shifts, and operator consequences. Each links to the run that produced it. The deepseek-harness profile carries the current evergreen state.
August 2026
-
rc.8 still has no privileged core, and the Web UI still has no login
- Still a developer preview. Do not expose the port.
- Read architecture.md at 141eb6fe before installing a plugin. Inspect a bundle's permission mode; do not attribute it to Claude Code or Codex alone. Pin bundle packages at 0.1.0-rc.8; npm latest on those packages is still 0.0.1-rc.1.
-
Everything is a plugin, including the components that enforce the limits
- If you write a dsh plugin, understand that your plugin is not governed by the approval gate in the way a tool is governed by a permission system. It sits in the same layer the gate does.
- Ask of any plugin-everything architecture: which component is not replaceable? If the answer is none, then the enforcement story is a convention rather than a boundary.
- This is developer preview and the whole project ships to a prerelease. Nothing here is an upgrade instruction; it is a design question to settle before this reaches a stable channel.
Run: 2026-08-17-weekly-digest-2026-08-10_2026-08-17-frontier-v0
-
Nothing authenticates the Web UI, and the code fence says so in its own comment
- Do not expose that port. Loopback-only is the entire access control, so any tunnel, container port mapping, or reverse proxy in front of it is the whole security boundary.
- Treat a third-party plugin as code you are running in-process with no declared permissions, because that is what it is. Read it before you install it.
Run: 2026-08-17-weekly-digest-2026-08-10_2026-08-17-frontier-v0
-
The lab's own harness ships a supported path to run rival models and drive rival harnesses
- A harness that runs any model and drives other harnesses is a hedge against the thing its own vendor sells. Read it as evidence about where that vendor thinks the lock-in is, and note that the answer is not the model.
- For an operator, this is the cheapest available test of whether a harness is really model-agnostic: run it against a competitor's model on the supported path and see what breaks.
Run: 2026-08-17-weekly-digest-2026-08-10_2026-08-17-frontier-v0